This is a screenshot of the image. Do you see anything problematic in it?
The image contains multiple duplications, and the redacted image is visible at the bottom. Additionally, this paper has other problematic issues: the description of the scanning electron microscopy does not correspond to the images.
https://pubpeer.com/publications/4E851B55D8E7684A38F8C7AF1751BC
The case is presented by Reese Richardson, who identified more than 2,000 cases of scanning electron microscopy inconsistencies across different papers
https://osf.io/preprints/osf/4wqcr
The image duplication is flagged by ImageTwin.
https://pubpeer.com/publications/4E851B55D8E7684A38F8C7AF1751BC
The case is presented by Reese Richardson, who identified more than 2,000 cases of scanning electron microscopy inconsistencies across different papers
https://osf.io/preprints/osf/4wqcr
The image duplication is flagged by ImageTwin.
