This is a screenshot of the reference list of a paper published in 2024. Do you see anything problematic in it?

A text version of the references is included for your convenience to investigate further:

1. X. Huang, Y. Xie, Y. Li. Exploring online teaching design of curriculum politics by deep learning and visual sensing technology. Comput. IN℡LIGENCE Neurosci., 2022 (2022), 10.1155/2022/1283256
2. C. Luo. Optimization algorithm for ideological and political curriculum environment in colleges using data analysis and neighborhood search operator. J. Environ. Public Health, 2022 (2022), 10.1155/2022/5833589
3. T. Yang, Z. Duan. Design of personalized ideological and political education resource recommendation system in the online education platform in the network environment. J. Environ. PUBLIC. Health, 2022 (2022), 10.1155/2022/3845749
4. S. Xu, J. Liu, K. Chen, Y. Yang. Research on the communication path of public opinion in university ideological and political network for big data analysis. J. Sens., 2022 (2022), 10.1155/2022/8354909.

The reference list contains many retracted papers, which is problematic because the study is not based on sound science.
To check the reference lists of the papers, it is recommended to download the PubPeer browser extension. If a paper has a PubPeer comment, the extension will flag it, and you will see alerts similar to those shown in the image.
PubPeer is a platform for post-publication comments on papers, many of which raise concerns about the research integrity of the studies.
https://pubpeer.com/static/extensions
https://pubpeer.com/